課程名稱 |
高等社會研究統計方法 Advanced Statistical Methods for Social Research |
開課學期 |
105-2 |
授課對象 |
生物資源暨農學院 生物產業傳播暨發展學研究所 |
授課教師 |
謝雨生 |
課號 |
BICD7128 |
課程識別碼 |
630 M1090 |
班次 |
|
學分 |
3.0 |
全/半年 |
半年 |
必/選修 |
選修 |
上課時間 |
星期三2,3,4(9:10~12:10) |
上課地點 |
生傳418室 |
備註 |
總人數上限:30人 |
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1052BICD7128_ |
課程簡介影片 |
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
課程大綱
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
課程概述 |
Multilevel Analysis
Structural Equation Models
Event History Analysis |
課程目標 |
實際掌握高等社會研究統計技術,並能用以引導研究發想。 |
課程要求 |
1. 每個統計分析方法單元都有實際資料分析的作業。每位上課同學都要依據作業時間與作業內容按時繳交作業。除了在課堂上繳交作業紙本外,同學亦必須在上課前一天凌晨12點前,將該次作業的電子檔上傳至本課程網站(ceiba),才算作業繳交完畢。
2. 所有上課的同學都需要按照進度課前閱讀指定的專書或研究論文,並於上課時繳交研究論文的閱讀紀要。紀要內容為依序回答下列十項問題,頁數不限,請使用中文書寫。除了在課堂上繳交作業紙本外,同學亦必須在上課前一天凌晨12點前,將該次作業的電子檔上傳至本課程網站(ceiba),才算作業繳交完畢。
(1). 作者為什麼要進行這個研究?
(2). 研究的問題和研究目的分別是什麼?
(3). 作者選擇了哪些詮釋理論?這些理論的大致內容如何?
(4). 研究的主要假設有哪些?
(5). 研究的樣本和資料來源如何?
(6). 研究的重要變項有哪些?(請區分依變項、核心自變項和控制變項)
(7). 作者採用哪些統計分析方法來處理研究資料?
(8). 此研究有哪些重要研究發現?
(9). 你對這篇研究整體的評論如何?
(10). 你對這篇論文閱讀後的心得。
3. 上課同學要參與課堂的報告提問和討論。
4. 期末考為one-week take-home exam。
5. 課程成績計算:平時作業40%,期末考佔50%,課堂報告和討論參與佔10%。
所有課程要求的作業一定要親自作,不能假手他人,或是抄襲他人的作業;不遵守者,本課程成績以不及格處理。
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
Office Hours |
|
指定閱讀 |
待補 |
參考書目 |
Multilevel Analysis
Readings:
1. Brown, Tyson H., Liana J. Richardson, Taylor W. Hargrove, and Courtney S.
Thomas
2016 “Using Multiple-hierarchy Stratification and Life Course Approaches to
Understand Health Inequalities: The Intersecting Consequences of Race, Gender, SES,
and Age.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 57(2): 200-222.
Reference:
2. Vuolo, Mike, Joy Kadowaki, and Brian C. Kelly
2016 “A Multilevel Test of Constrained Choices Theory: The Case of Tobacco Clean
Air Restrictions.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 57(3): 351-372.
3. Bamoran, Adam, Sarah Barfels, and Ana Cristina Collares
2016 “Does Racial Isolation in School Lead to Long-Term Disadvantages? Labor Market
Consequences of High School Racial Composition.” American Journal of Sociology
121(4): 1116-67.
4. Musick, Kelly, Ann Meier, and Sarah Flood
2016 “How Parents Fare: Mothers’ and Fathers’ Subjective Well-Being in Time with
Children.” American Sociological Review 81(5): 1069-1095.
5. South, Scott J, Ying Huang, Amy Spring, and Kyle Crowder
2016 “Neighborhood Attainment over the Adult Life Course.” American Sociological
Review 81(6): 1276-1304.
6. Liu, Hexuan and Guang Guo
2015 “Lifetime Socioeconomic Status, Historical Context, and Genetic Inheritance
in Shaping Body Mass in Middle and Late Adulthood.” American Sociological Review
80:705-737.
7. Hughes, Melanie M. and Lisa D. Brush
2015 “The Price of Protection: A Trajectory Analysis of Civil Remedies for Abuse
and Women’s Earnings.” American Sociological Review 80:140-165.
8. Brady, David, Regina S. Baker, and Ryan Finnigan
2013 “When Unionization Disappears: State-Level Unionization and Working Poverty in
the United States.” American Sociological Review 78:872-896.
9. Young, Marisa and Blair Wheaton
2013 “The Impact of Neighborhood Composition on Work-Family Conflict and
Distress.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 54:481-497.
10. Lyness, Karen S., Janet C. Gornick, Pamela Stone, and Angela R. Grotto
2012 “It’s All about Control: Worker Control over Schedule and Hours in Cross-
National Context” American Sociological Review 77: 1023-1049.
11. Schafer, Markus H., Kenneth F. Ferraro, and Sarah A. Mustillo
2011 “Children of Misfortune: Early Adversity and Cumulative Inequality in
Perceived Life Trajectories” American Journal of Sociology 116: 1053-1091.
Methods:
1. Raudenbush, Stephen W. and Anthony Bryk S.
2001 Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. CA: Sage.
2. Snijders, Tom A. B. and Roel Bosker
2011 Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel
Modeling. London: Sage.
3. Raudenbush, Stephen W., Anthony S. Bryk, Yuk Fai Cheong, Richard T. Congdon, Jr.,
and Mathilda du Toit
2011 HLM7: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling. IL: Scientific Software
International.
4. Singer, Judith D.
1998 “Using SAS PROC MIXED to Fit Multilevel Models, Hierarchical Models, and
Individual Growth Models.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 24: 323-
355.
5. Campbell, Lorne and Deborah A. Kashy
2002 “Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC
MIXED and HLM: A user-friendly guide.” Personal Relationships 9: 327-342.
6. Muthen, Linda K. and Bengt O. Muthen
2010 Mplus User’s Guide. CA: Muthen & Muthen
7. Singer, Judith D. and John B. Willett
2003 Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. NY:
Oxford University Press.
Structural Equation Models
Readings:
1. Fothergill, Kate, et al.
2016 “Pathways from Early Childhood Adversity to Later Adult Drug Use and
Psychological Distress: A Prospective Study of a Cohort of African Americans.”
Journal of Health and Social Behavior 57(2):223-239.
Reference:
2. Kane, Jennifer
2015 “An Integrative Model of Inter-and Intragenerational Preconception Processes
Influencing Birthweight in the United States.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior
56:246-261.
3. Burt, Callie Harbin, Ronald L. Simons, and Frederick X. Gibbons
2012 “Racial Discrimination, Ethnic-Racial Socialization, and Crime: A Micro-
sociological Model of Risk and Resilience” American Sociological Review 77: 648-677.
4. Soehl, Thomas and Roger Waldinger
2012 “Inheriting the Homeland? Intergenerational Transmission of Cross-Border Ties
in Migrant Families” American Journal of Sociology 118: 778-813.
Methods:
1. Rex B. Kline
2010 Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. NY: Guilford.
2. Bollen, Kenneth A.
1989 Structural Equations with Latent Variables. NY: Wiley.
3. Schumacker, Randall E. and Richard G. Lomax
2010 A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. NY: Routledge Academic.
4. Joreskog, K.G. and D. Sorbom
2001 LISREL 8 user's reference guide. IL: Scientific Software International.
Event History Analysis
Readings:
1. Dokshin, Fedor A.
2016 “Whose Backyard and What’s at Issue? Spatial and Ideological Dynamics of Local
Opposition to Fracking in New York State, 2010 to 2013.” American Sociological
Review 81(5):921-948.
Reference:
2. Goldberg, Amir, Sameer B. Srivastava, V. Govind Manian, William Monroe, and
Christopher Potts
2016 “Fitting In or Standing Out? The Tradeoffs of Structural and Cultural
Embeddedness.” American Sociological Review 81(6):1190-1222.
3. Jennings, Elyse A., William G. Axinn, and Dirgha J. Ghimire
2012 “The Effect of Parents’ Attitudes on Sons’ Marriage Timing” American
Sociological Review 77: 923-945.
4. Zheng, Hui and Patricia A. Thomas
2013 “Marital Status, Self-Rated Health, and Mortality: Overestimation of Health or
Diminishing Protection of Marriage? ” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 54(1):
128-143.
Methods:
1. Kleinbaum, David G. amd Mitchel Klein
2011 Survival Analysis: A Self-Learning Text. NY: Springer.
2. Box-Steffensmerier, Janet M. and Bradford S. Jones
2004 Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
3. Allison, Paul D.
2010 Survival Analysis Using the SAS System: A Practical Guide. NC: SAS
Publishing.
4. Yamaguchi, Kazuo
1991 Event History Analysis. CA: SAGE.
5. Singer, Judith D. and John B. Willett
2003 Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. NY:
Oxford University Press.
|
評量方式 (僅供參考) |
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
第1週 |
2/22 |
Introduction to Class |
第2週 |
3/01 |
Multilevel Analysis 1 |
第3週 |
3/08 |
Multilevel Analysis 2 |
第4週 |
3/15 |
Multilevel Analysis 3 |
第5週 |
3/22 |
Multilevel Analysis 4 |
第6週 |
3/29 |
Multilevel Analysis 5
Readings Discussion on Multilevel Analysis |
第7週 |
4/05 |
No Class |
第8週 |
4/12 |
Structural Equation Models 1 |
第9週 |
4/19 |
Structural Equation Models 2 |
第10週 |
4/26 |
Structural Equation Models 3 |
第11週 |
5/03 |
Structural Equation Models 4 |
第12週 |
5/10 |
Structural Equation Models 5 |
第13週 |
5/17 |
Structural Equation Models 6
Readings Discussion on Structural Equation Models |
第14週 |
5/24 |
Event History Analysis 1 |
第15週 |
5/31 |
Event History Analysis 2 |
第16週 |
6/07 |
Event History Analysis 3 |
第17週 |
6/14 |
Event History Analysis 4 (Final Exam begins) |
第18週 |
06/21 |
Event History Analysis 5 (Final Exam due)
Readings Discussion on Event History Analysis |
|